SHRINKING
DEMOCRATIC SPACES AND NEO-LIBERAL
FUNDAMENTALISM
FUNDAMENTALISM
19-20
March 2016 (NEW DELHI)
Venue:
Rajendra Bhawan, opp GPF, near ITO.
The
last two decades has not only witnessed the domination of the
reactionary neo-liberal project with a total corporate takeover of
entire political, economic and social spaces; and attempting to loot
land and other natural resources. While maintaining a benevolent
self-image, coated with sweet-sounding words like freedom, liberty,
choice and rights, it has been successful in installing an inherently
violent and authoritarian culture. Of course, the fullest freedom,
liberty and rights has been accorded to corporations and capital but,
for the majority of the Indian population, neo-liberalism has
exacerbated poverty and inequality, hindered the potential for social
justice, and is now increasingly thrusting countless numbers into
destitution. The primitive accumulation through forced dispossession
is accomplished with exceptional and emblematic violence and, also an
usurpation of the democratic space.
The
pseudonym “good governance” has in fact, masked the instauration
of opaque decision making and the growth of unaccountable elites. Or,
why would the government through the land bill amendments attempt to
get rid of the need for people’s consent in land acquisition? The
idea of “good governance”, promoted by the World Bank three
decades back was an uniform prescription for all borrowing countries
to create mechanisms and facilitate processes for the withdrawal of
the state in favor of the market. Any attempt to step in the
direction of reducing socio-economic disparities through distributive
justice is seen as an infringement on the process.
It
has also been ably backed by another simultaneous reactionary
programme - the Hindutva project. An introspection into its nature
suggests that their simultaneous growth is not accidental. While
neo-liberalism proceeds with ruthless speed to privatize and
financialize and, attempting to transfer publicly or commonly held
assets and resources into private property, Hindutva efficiently
divides the society and weakens resistance. While neo-liberalism is
an accumulation strategy aimed at restoring class power, the Hindutva
project effectively diverts our attention from class conflict, to
split and sabotage working class struggles and to deflect
class-driven anxieties on to minority communities. While the Hindutva
protagonists engage the nation in non-issues I.e. controversy over
the ban of beef eating, the government silently passes acts and
ordinances to enrich capitalists, cronies and beneficiaries
resulting in an incremental dispossession, poverty, discrimination
and inequality.
The
marriage between neo-liberal market fundamentalism and Hindutva is a
perfect recipe for authoritarianism. It has mounted merciless attack
on active citizenly virtue, and values of egalitarianism and
solidarity. While vociferously preaching for the withdrawal of the
state especially, its regulatory & control functions,
neo-liberalism has vastly armed the coercive sections and functions
of the state. The inventory of Hindutva
authoritarianism
is indeed extensive, working full time to facilitate the attack on
democracy and democratic spaces. Its cultural and moral prescriptions
attempts to create a monolithic society where any dissent or
difference of being would be least tolerated. While the Prime
Minister eulogizes the “Gujarat Model”, the VHP obscenely demands
that dissenters are sent to Pakistan or the 'Gujarat experiment' be
enacted to teach all non-Hindus a lesson.
Similarly,
to strangle any attempt to question the cold hard facts that this
restoration and reconstitution of naked class power has wrought, the
ruling hierarchy stifles any form of dissent, protests or even
democratic opinions within the society. At the same time, the public
relation exercises of the state and capital are geared up to justify
and legitimise whatever needed to be done to achieve this goal. The
terrible fascistic ambition of turning secular and democratic India
into a fascist state can not be ruled out.
In
this context, the INSAF is organising a national convention on the
theme “Shrinking democratic spaces and neo-liberal fundamentalism”.
The
following is a programme outline:
19 March 2016 (Saturday)
Inaugural Session
10.30
– 01.00
P.
Sainath
Teesta
Setalwad
Chair:
Uma Chakravarty
Attack on Freedom of Expression
2.30
– 5.30
Neelabh Mishra, Amit
Sen Gupta, Manglesh Dabral, Manmohan,
Ranjit Verma, Saba
Naqvi, Gauhar Raza, Manimala
Chair: Saroop Dhruv
Cultures of Resistances
06.00 – 09.00
Morche
par Kavi – Hindi “poetry of resistances” recitation
Revolutionary
Songs - URBAN FOLK
“Khatra”
- Play by IPTA
“Ye Hai Sacchai” - Play & Songs by
Sangwari
Moderated
by Renu Singh
20 March 2016 (Sunday)
Culture
of intolerance
10.00 – 01.00
Sanjay
Kak, Amar Kanwar, Gargi Sen
Meera
Chaudhary, Soumitro Dastidar
Chair:
Rahul Roy
Fascism
of the 21st century
02.30 – 05.30
Students
in Struggle (FTII, JNUSU & HCU)
Achin
Vanaik, Subhash Gatade
Chair: Anil Chaudhary
No comments:
Post a Comment